GOP Review: No Proof AZ Election Stolen09/25 08:48
PHOENIX (AP) -- A Republican-backed review of the 2020 presidential election
in Arizona's largest county ended Friday without producing proof to support
former President Donald Trump's false claims of a stolen election.
After six months of searching for evidence of fraud, the firm hired by
Republican lawmakers issued a report that experts described as riddled with
errors, bias and flawed methodology. Still, even that partisan review came up
with a vote tally that would not have altered the outcome, finding that Biden
won by 360 more votes than the official results certified last year.
The finding was an embarrassing end to a widely criticized, and at times
bizarre, quest to prove allegations that election officials and courts have
rejected. It has no bearing on the final, certified results. Previous reviews
of the 2.1 million ballots by nonpartisan professionals that followed state law
have found no significant problem with the vote count in Maricopa County, home
to Phoenix. Biden won the county by 45,000 votes, key to his 10,500-vote win of
For many critics the conclusions, presented at a hearing Friday by the firm
Cyber Ninjas, underscored the dangerous futility of the exercise, which has
helped fuel skepticism about the validity of the 2020 election and spawned
copycat audits nationwide.
"We haven't learned anything new," said Matt Masterson, a top U.S. election
security official in the Trump administration. "What we have learned from all
this is that the Ninjas were paid millions of dollars, politicians raised
millions of dollars and Americans' trust in democracy is lower."
Cyber Ninjas acknowledged in its report that there were "no substantial
differences" between the group's hand count of ballots and the official count.
But the report also made a series of other disputed claims the auditors say
should cast doubt on the accuracy and warrant more investigation.
Trump issued statements Friday falsely claiming the review found widespread
fraud. He urged Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a Republican vying for
his party's U.S. Senate nomination, to open an investigation.
Brnovich, who has been criticized by Trump supporters for not adequately
backing the review, did not commit: "I will take all necessary actions that are
supported by the evidence and where I have legal authority," he said in a
statement before the report was made public.
Republicans in the state Senate ordered the review under pressure from Trump
and his allies, subpoenaing the election records from Maricopa County and
selected the inexperienced, pro-Trump auditors. It took months longer than
expected and was widely pilloried by experts.
Still, the Arizona review has become a model that Trump supporters are
pushing to replicate in other swing states where Biden won. Pennsylvania's
Democratic attorney general sued Thursday to block a GOP-issued subpoena for a
wide array of election materials. In Wisconsin, a retired conservative state
Supreme Court justice is leading a Republican-ordered investigation into the
2020 election, and this week threatened to subpoena election officials who
don't comply. Backers also called for additional election reviews in Arizona on
None of the reviews can change Biden's victory, which was certified by
officials in each of the swing states he won and by Congress on Jan. 6 -- after
Trump's supporters, fueled by the same false charges that generated the audits,
stormed the U.S. Capitol to try to prevent certification of his loss.
The Arizona report claims a number of shortcomings in election procedures
and suggested the final tally still could not be relied upon. Several were
challenged by election experts, while members of the Republican-led county
Board of Supervisors, which oversees elections, disputed claims on Twitter.
"Unfortunately, the report is also littered with errors & faulty conclusions
about how Maricopa County conducted the 2020 General Election," county
Election officials say that's because the review team is biased, ignored the
detailed vote-counting procedures in Arizona law and had no experience in the
complex field of election audits.
Two of the report's recommendations stood out because they showed its
authors misunderstood election procedures -- that there should be paper ballot
backups and that voting machines should not be connected to the internet. All
Maricopa ballots are already paper, with machines only used to tabulate the
votes, and those tabulators are not connected to the internet.
The review also checked the names of voters against a commercial database,
finding 23,344 reported moving before ballots went out in October. While the
review suggests something improper, election officials note that voters like
college students, those who own vacation homes or military members can move to
temporary locations while still legally voting at the address where they are
"A competent reviewer of an election would not make a claim like that," said
Trey Grayson, a former Republican secretary of state in Kentucky.
The election review was run by Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan, whose firm has
never conducted an election audit before. Logan previously worked with
attorneys and Trump supporters trying to overturn the 2020 election and
appeared in a film questioning the results of the contest while the ballot
review was ongoing.
Logan and others involved with the review presented their findings to two
Arizona senators Friday. It kicked off with Shiva Ayyadurai, a COVID-19 vaccine
skeptic who claims to have invented email, presenting an analysis relying on
"pattern recognition" that flagged purported anomalies in the way mail ballots
were processed at the end of the election.
Maricopa County tweeted that the pattern was simply the election office
following state law.
"'Anomaly' seems to be another way of saying the Senate's contractors don't
understand election processes," the county posted during the testimony.
Logan followed up by acknowledging "the ballots that were provided for us to
count ... very accurately correlated with the official canvass." He then
continued to flag statistical discrepancies -- including the voters who moved
-- that he said merited further investigation.
The review has a history of exploring outlandish conspiracy theories,
dedicating time to checking for bamboo fibers on ballots to see if they were
secretly shipped in from Asia. It's also served as a content-generation machine
for Trump's effort to sow skepticism about his loss, pumping out misleading and
out-of-context information that the former president circulates long after it's
In July, for example, Logan laid out a series of claims stemming from his
misunderstanding of the election data he was analyzing, including that 74,000
mail ballots were recorded as received but not sent. Trump repeatedly amplified
the claims. Logan had compared two databases that track different things.
Arizona's Senate agreed to spend $150,000 on the review, plus security and
facility costs. That pales in comparison to the nearly $5.7 million contributed
as of late July by Trump allies.
Maricopa County's official vote count was conducted in front of bipartisan
observers, as were legally required audits meant to ensure voting machines work
properly. A partial hand-count spot check found a perfect match.
Two extra post-election reviews by federally certified election experts also
found no evidence that voting machines switched votes or were connected to the
internet. The county Board of Supervisors commissioned the extraordinary
reviews in an effort to prove to Trump backers that there were no problems.